Volta

Accuracy of package inserts of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests: a secondary analysis of manufacturer versus systematic review data

Unknown authors · 2023
hash_id: 190811971b1749ff9b3b0a727e9b92c1f9e5e1cca0688f8c55b002417ef37ef2 · DOI: 10.1016/s2666-5247(23)00222-7

BACKGROUND: Rapid antigen tests (RATs) were crucial during the COVID-19 pandemic. Information provided by the test manufacturer in product package inserts, also known as instructions for use (IFUs), is often the only data available to clinicians, public health professionals, and individuals on the diagnostic accuracy of these tests. We aimed to assess whether manufacturer IFU accuracy data aligned with evidence from independent research. METHODS: We searched company websites for package inserts for RATs that were included in the July 2022 update of the Cochrane meta-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 RATs, which served as a benchmark for research evidence. We fitted bivariate hierarchical models to obtain absolute differences in sensitivity and specificity between IFU and Cochrane Review estimates for each test, as well …

Reference & gravity metrics

Citations
0
Citations / yr
0.00
RCR
Mass
0.00
Depth
0.00
Momentum
0.000
Burn rate
0.00 ATP/day
Start price
25.00 ATP

Secondary-market trade history

No secondary-market trades recorded for this Volta yet.

References (0)

No outbound references recorded.

Cited by (1)

Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection secondary