Volta

Participation of natural resource managers on editorial boards of conservation and applied natural resource journals

Unknown authors · 2016
hash_id: 2ed370a37f7f98e969ae829361adfc151f9013270f7f3d5e59afeb71d4ff566b · DOI: 10.1017/s0030605315001465

Abstract A gap between research and management exists in numerous natural resource fields. This can lead to management actions that are based on experience rather than evidence and may be less effective as a result. The gap may be partly attributable to research not being relevant, timely or accessible for managers. Editorial boards of peer-reviewed journals are responsible for determining the relevance of submitted manuscripts for a journal's readership. Limited representation of natural resource managers on editorial boards may make it more difficult for journals to identify the topics and findings of most relevance for management, thus contributing to the research–management gap. We quantified the representation of natural resource managers on the editorial boards of 79 conservation and applied natural …

Reference & gravity metrics

Citations
0
Citations / yr
0.00
RCR
Mass
0.00
Depth
0.00
Momentum
0.000
Burn rate
0.00 ATP/day
Start price
25.00 ATP

Secondary-market trade history

No secondary-market trades recorded for this Volta yet.

References (0)

No outbound references recorded.

Cited by (1)

Putting applied ecology into practice secondary