Volta

Optimal design for on-farm strip trials—systematic or randomised?

Unknown authors · 2024
hash_id: 3df3fc9d28a7a51fd178d0d71fa4cf36dda29c60e512d4e089a9cfa887d5766c · DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109594

Randomised designs are often preferred over systematic designs by agronomists and biometricians. For on-farm trials, however, the choice may depend on the objective of the experiment. If the purpose is to create a prescription map of a continuous input for each plot in a grid covering a large strip trial, a systematic design may be a better choice, although it often attracts less discussion and attention. This study aims to evaluate the performance of systematic designs with geographically weighted regression (GWR) models in addressing spatial variation and estimating continuous treatment effects in large strip trials through numeric simulations. A hierarchical model with spatially correlated random parameters is utilised to generate simulated data for various scenarios of large strip on-farm trials. …

Reference & gravity metrics

Citations
0
Citations / yr
0.00
RCR
Mass
0.00
Depth
0.00
Momentum
0.000
Burn rate
0.00 ATP/day
Start price
25.00 ATP

Secondary-market trade history

No secondary-market trades recorded for this Volta yet.

References (0)

No outbound references recorded.

Cited by (1)

Publishing Agronomic Data secondary