Volta

Self-administered versus clinician-performed BinaxNOW COVID rapid test: a comparison of accuracy

Unknown authors · 2024
hash_id: 749f27ecdc8b47edd8d61ceaa86f851f1527d309feeed8746e5b522720ecfaeb · DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02525-23

ABSTRACT We conducted a single-center study at a free community testing site in Baltimore City to assess the accuracy of self-performed rapid antigen tests (RATs) for COVID-19. Self-administered BinaxNOW RATs were compared with clinician-performed RATs and against a reference lab molecular testing as the gold standard. Of the 953 participants, 14.9% were positive for SARS- CoV-2 as determined by RT-PCR. The sensitivity and specificity were similar for both self- and clinician-performed RATs (sensitivity: 83.9% vs 88.2%, P = 0.40; specificity: 99.8% vs 99.6%, P = 0.6). Subgroup comparisons based on age and race yielded similar results. Notably, 5.2% (95% CI: 1.5% to 9.5%) of positive results were potentially missed due to participant misinterpretation of the self-test card. However, the false-positive …

Reference & gravity metrics

Citations
0
Citations / yr
0.00
RCR
Mass
0.00
Depth
0.00
Momentum
0.000
Burn rate
0.00 ATP/day
Start price
25.00 ATP

Secondary-market trade history

No secondary-market trades recorded for this Volta yet.

References (0)

No outbound references recorded.

Cited by (1)

Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: An up… secondary