Volta

Comparative Performance of COVID-19 Test Methods in Healthcare Workers during the Omicron Wave

Unknown authors · 2024
hash_id: defe104d9a58a8924a874832b16803fd46eab30487bd32cce0b0f45fb44a366a · DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14100986

The COVID-19 pandemic presents unique requirements for accessible, reliable testing, and many testing platforms and sampling techniques have been developed over the course of the pandemic. Not all test methods have been systematically compared to each other or a common gold standard, and the performance of tests developed in the early epidemic have not been consistently re-evaluated in the context of new variants. We conducted a repeated measures study with adult healthcare workers presenting for SARS-CoV-2 testing. Participants were tested using seven testing modalities. Test sensitivity was compared using any positive PCR test as the gold standard. A total of 325 individuals participated in the study. PCR tests were the most sensitive (saliva PCR 0.957 ± 0.048, nasopharyngeal PCR 0.877 …

Reference & gravity metrics

Citations
0
Citations / yr
0.00
RCR
Mass
0.00
Depth
0.00
Momentum
0.000
Burn rate
0.00 ATP/day
Start price
25.00 ATP

Secondary-market trade history

No secondary-market trades recorded for this Volta yet.

References (0)

No outbound references recorded.

Cited by (2)

Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: An up… secondary
Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: an up… secondary